Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.23 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cosmic Purple, Moonlight White, Nebula Purple, Neptune Blue and Space Black | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 227.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, getting a general score of 86.3 against 74.6. These phones use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features and some performance improvements. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's body is newer, just a bit thinner and a little lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because although it has a quite lower pixel amount in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a camera in the back with a higher resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way bigger aperture for better photography and video in low light environments.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.