Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.23 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cosmic Purple, Moonlight White, Nebula Purple, Neptune Blue and Space Black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 227.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8's 74.6 overall score. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has Android 10, offering some nice extra features and performance improvements. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a way newer phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, but it's just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because although it has a quite lower pixels number per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better video frame rate, a way bigger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality, a larger aperture and a back camera with more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.