Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.23 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cosmic Purple, Moonlight White, Nebula Purple, Neptune Blue and Space Black | -- |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 227.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, getting a score of 79.4 against 74.6. These devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's design is way newer and just a little thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because although it has a little bit lower display pixel density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has a much better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy A35 5G has better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Galaxy A35 5G's camera is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 8's camera, and although the Galaxy A35 5G has a higher resolution camera in the back and a larger sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures, they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.