Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.23 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Cosmic Purple, Moonlight White, Nebula Purple, Neptune Blue and Space Black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 227.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8's overall score of 74.6. Galaxy F62's body is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy F62 has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has Android 10 version.
Galaxy F62 features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 3 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger display.
Galaxy F62 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a larger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy F62 has a much better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.