Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2019-10-16 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.23 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cosmic Purple, Moonlight White, Nebula Purple, Neptune Blue and Space Black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 227.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 409 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy On7 Prime has an overall score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8's score of 74.6. Galaxy On7 Prime is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, but it is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy On7 Prime has 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has Android 10 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a quite bigger display and a quite better pixels quantity in each inch in the display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a much higher (4K) video definition, a way bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs, a larger aperture and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Galaxy On7 Prime has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has better battery lifetime than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 21% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.