Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.23 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Cosmic Purple, Moonlight White, Nebula Purple, Neptune Blue and Space Black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 227.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8's score of 74.6. Samsung Galaxy S10e's body is a little thinner and way lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, even though both were released with only 7 months difference. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixel number in each inch of screen. The Galaxy S10e counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3100mAh.
The Galaxy S10e is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.