Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.23 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic Purple, Moonlight White, Nebula Purple, Neptune Blue and Space Black | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 227.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, with an 85.6 score against 74.6. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has Android 10, so it offers a couple additional features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer device, and it's also just a bit lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because it has a just a little greater pixels density, a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a bit bigger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 also has a back camera with a much higher resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features much more storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.