Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a overall score of 84.9 against 75.6. The iPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Even when iPhone 11 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were released with only a few months difference, iPhone 11 Pro is just a bit lighter and a little thinner.
The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64-bits processor. IPhone 11 Pro has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little greater pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes better pictures and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a way larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos and a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 31% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.