Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with a score of 85 against 75.6. The Apple iPhone 8 body is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, even though it was released many years before. The iPhone 8 counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, although it has a lot worse resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels, a just a bit lower screen density and a really smaller display.
The Apple iPhone 8 has a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The iPhone 8 counts with a better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has lesser processing cores and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a much better battery life than iPhone 8, because it has a 120% larger battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a superior camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking way better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.