Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a general score of 84.5 against 75.6. The Apple iPhone XS Max is an older and a little heavier phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but Apple managed to build it somewhat thinner anyway. IPhone XS Max has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of screen, a little bigger screen and a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 resolution.
Apple iPhone XS Max features a better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a bigger storage for apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with greater battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3179mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T captures much better videos and photos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a way more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.