Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, having an 80.3 score against 75.6. The Google Nexus 6P is an noticeably older phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but Google made it thinner and lighter anyway. The Google Nexus 6P has a processing unit that's just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T one, both have 8 cpu cores and a 3 GB RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T shoots much better videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a bigger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a better storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a bit superior battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.