Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's general score of 75.6. The Google Pixel 2 body is a lot lighter and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, although it was released 2 years before. Google Pixel 2 features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 2 features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixels density. Google Pixel 2 counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a much higher resolution camera in the back and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.