Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, having a global score of 83.7 against 75.6. Even though the LG V50 ThinQ and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were released with only a few months difference, the LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a little bigger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a higher pixels amount per inch of screen. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T feature very similar batteries performance. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.