Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting a 76.4 score against 75.6. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Droid Turbo has 4.4.4 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Motorola Droid Turbo is incredibly older and way thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, it's construction is still lighter.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has lesser cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a little better battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a bigger aperture for better low-light images and video, better video frame rate and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.