Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has a general score of 77.9, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's 75.6 general score. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola DROID Turbo design is lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but it is way thicker and was released many years before.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a bit better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light situations, a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and faster 30 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.