Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's general score of 75.6. Motorola Edge 50 is a newer phone, and it is also just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a little more pixels per screen inch, a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a little bigger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 5 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels and a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a much greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 features greater battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.