Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, getting an 82.3 score against 75.6. These phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A60 has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even when Samsung Galaxy A60 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T were released only 3 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A60 is lighter and a little thinner.
Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A60 has a screen that is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's display, both of them have a display with the same size, a greater pixel quantity in each screen inch and the same 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a much better camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and a way more MP back facing camera.
The Galaxy A60 features a better storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.