Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with a score of 84.2 against 75.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter. Galaxy A7 (2018) features a screen that is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T one, because although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2220px resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel number in each display inch.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a way larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.