Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with a general score of 84.9 against 75.6. Although it's the best we are comparing here, the Galaxy A80 body is a bit heavier and a little thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A80 counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A80 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A80, because it has an 8% larger battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution camera, a same size sensor, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also has a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.