Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-26 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with an 81 score against 75.6. The Galaxy C9 Pro is an noticeably older phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but Samsung made it noticeably thinner and just a little bit lighter anyway. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T and the Galaxy C9 Pro count with incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy C9 Pro has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little bigger display and a little greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a much better video resolution and a camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 256 GB, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy C9 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T feature similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.