Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T's score of 75.6. These phones have Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, it's much thinner and also noticeably newer.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a bigger display, a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a more mega-pixels back facing camera, a much larger sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures and a much higher video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.