Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-26 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Moonlight white, Neptune blue and Space black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, with a score of 85.5 against 75.6. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is an older and just a little thicker phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, but Xiaomi managed to make it just a little bit lighter anyway. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, although it has a bit smaller display, a quite worse pixels density and a quite lower 1080 x 2246 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T features a better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 256 GB, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more internal storage. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery performance in Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.