Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 969.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 7 Plus is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with an 83.8 score against 81.1. The Apple iPhone 7 Plus design is thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The iPhone 7 Plus counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a little better performance than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a greater number of cores (although they are slower) and 3 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than iPhone 7 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor.
The Apple iPhone 7 Plus has more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 7 Plus is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.