Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, having a score of 81.6 against 81.1. The Google Pixel 2 body is incredibly lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better display pixel density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 2 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.