Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's general score of 81.1. Google Pixel XL's design is lighter and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel XL features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 3450mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a larger diafragm aperture and a way more mega pixels camera.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.