Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, getting an 83.7 score against 81.1. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is lighter and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it was released a little bit further than a year before. Both devices in our current comparison use the same Android 10 operating system, so both should give very similar OS features.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and more pixels per display inch. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with greater battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 26% more battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much tinier diafragm aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a way more MP back-facing camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.