Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 general score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is older, just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than OPPO Find X3 Pro. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a better 1440 x 3216px resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro's camera is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's camera, because although the OPPO Find X3 Pro has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much worse resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and a bigger camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better battery life than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.