Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 construction is a bit lighter but a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and both were released with only a few months difference. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro comes with Android 10 operating system.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a bit larger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a higher screen density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A32 features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a battery performance that is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's battery life, although the Samsung Galaxy A32 has just 5000mAh of battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.