Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-05 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with an 82.3 score against 81.1. Galaxy A60 is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A60 has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10, providing a couple nice extra features.
The Galaxy A60 features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit greater screen pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A60. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A60, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a way more mega-pixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A60, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.