Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, getting a 91.8 score against 81.1. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10. Galaxy A71 5G is a just a little bit thinner and lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, even when both were released with only 2 months difference.
The Galaxy A71 5G's processing unit is very similar to the CPU in Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the same count of pixels in each display inch and a display of the same size.
Galaxy A71 5G has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same sensor size, the same resolution back camera and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a bigger camera aperture to take better images in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 12 percent larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G costs more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.