Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-05 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A80 construction is older, just a little thicker and a little heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A80, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A80 counts with a display that's just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's screen, they have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the same screen density and a same size display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 36 percent more battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger sensor which gives a better image and video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and a back camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.