Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-05-05 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, having a 90.5 score against 81.1. Galaxy A90 5G's construction is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, even though both of them were released with only 8 months difference. Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android operating system, and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro comes with Android 10 operating system.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM. Galaxy A90 5G has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have a display with the same size, a greater pixel quantity per inch of screen and an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs, a larger aperture and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy A90 5G has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.