Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-05 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 general score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro construction is noticeably newer, but heavier and notably thicker than the Galaxy C9 Pro.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have 8 processing cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little bit better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit bigger display, a bit more pixels per display inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a much better video quality and a much higher resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has superior battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.