Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy S6 edge+'s score of 79.3. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version and Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1, so it provides the user a lot of extra features. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a noticeably newer cellphone than the Galaxy S6 edge+, although it is much heavier and way thicker.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a better CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more CPU cores. Galaxy S6 edge+ features a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher screen pixels density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a F1.9 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a camera with much more megapixels and a much bigger sensor which offers a much better image and video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.