Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 291.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is an a lot older and notably thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi was able to make it a little bit lighter anyway. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a larger display, a quite greater pixels density and a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less megapixels, it also counts with a much bigger sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality, a lot higher video resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 5020mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.