Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-05 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 291.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's score of 78.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is an older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier device than the vivo X60 Pro. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version.
The vivo X60 Pro has a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density. Vivo X60 Pro counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features greater battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or videos in low light situations and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera and a larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.