Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 global score. The Google Pixel 2 is an notably older phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but Google made it way lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a way smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Google Pixel 2 counts with slightly more memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.