Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a score of 76.6, which is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's score of 76.4. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has the previous 10 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 construction is much newer and incredibly thinner, but also heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an additional GPU. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a way better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better display pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 captures much better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has faster video frame rate, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low-light situations and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that holds up to 128 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has improved battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 29% greater battery size.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.