Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, getting a 77.9 score against 76.6. Despite of the fact Motorola DROID Turbo is older and extremely thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's body is still somewhat lighter. These phones include Android OS, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, so it gives you lots of additional features and better performance.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel count in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 128 GB.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has 4 less cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a graphics processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with greater battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution and faster 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.