Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, getting an 81.2 score against 76.6. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version, so it gives you some extra features. The Motorola Edge 50 is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a slightly higher 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution, a little larger display and a little bit higher pixels density. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 5 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 has a battery life that's very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 one, although the Motorola Edge 50 has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a much larger sensor, a lot higher video quality and a better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.