Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with a general score of 79.7 against 76.6. Even though the Motorola Moto G Stylus and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 were released with only a couple of months difference, the Motorola Moto G Stylus design is a little lighter but a little bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto G Stylus has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10.
Motorola Moto G Stylus and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 count with incredibly similar processing units, and although the Motorola Moto G Stylus has more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 and Moto G Stylus both count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Moto G Stylus has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixel density.
The Moto G Stylus features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and a 48 MP back camera, the Moto G Stylus also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution. The Moto G Stylus has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has greater battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Moto G Stylus costs a bit more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.