Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-05-20 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 396 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with a overall score of 84.7 against 76.6. Even being the best device in this comparison review, Galaxy A32's construction is a little thicker and a bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. The Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 operating system.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a more vivid display than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a higher screen density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 and Samsung Galaxy A32 both have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A32 has 1 GB more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A32. Both of them have the same video frame rates, a 48 megapixels camera, a F1.8 aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality. The Galaxy A32 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 and the Galaxy A32 feature really similar batteries, although the Galaxy A32 has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.