Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-20 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, getting a general score of 81 against 76.6. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is way older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and noticeably thinner. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, providing you a lot of extra features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro feature very similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a higher amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little larger display.
Galaxy C9 Pro has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a way more MP camera in the back and a larger aperture for better low-light captures.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features greater battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 26 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.