Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 283.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 overall score. These phones work with Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and better performance. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a much newer and much thinner device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, although it's just a little bit heavier.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480px resolution, a bigger screen and a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch of display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a higher resolution camera in the back, a way better video definition, a bigger aperture and a way larger camera sensor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 5020mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.