Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a global score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's general score of 76.6. The vivo X60 Pro is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the vivo X60 Pro has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version, so it offers some extra features and performance tweaks.
The vivo X60 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has 9 GB more RAM. The vivo X60 Pro has a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little inferior pixel count per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same sensor size, a same resolution camera in the back and a same size aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a way higher (4K) video definition. The vivo X60 Pro features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features improved battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.