Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 283.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having a global score of 85.5 against 76.6. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a a bit lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but both of them have the same thickness. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2246px, it also counts with a little greater pixel density.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has better battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited situations, a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.