Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-07 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having a overall score of 80.3 against 79. The Google Nexus 6P is an a lot older device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but Google was able to build it somewhat thinner and lighter. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features just a little better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has more RAM memory.
Google Nexus 6P has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a superior camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a larger aperture to capture better low light photography, a bigger back camera sensor and a lot better resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.