Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-07 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having a 79.1 score against 79. LG V30 is an notably older device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but LG was able to make it noticeably lighter and thinner. LG V30 features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V30 features just a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM. The LG V30 features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V30 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots better photographs and videos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back and a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a very superior battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it is more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG V30, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.