Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-07 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's global score of 79. LG V50 ThinQ is an older phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but it is somewhat lighter and a little thinner anyway. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11.
LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has superior battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.