Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-04-07 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a score of 79, which is slightly better than Motorola Droid Turbo's general score of 76.4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's construction is noticeably newer and extremely thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has an older 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has less RAM memory and less processing cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Motorola Droid Turbo features an incredibly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with much more memory for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has better video frame rate, a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has better battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a better device, it costs more than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.